Differences between revisions 4 and 5
Revision 4 as of 2015-06-27 15:49:09
Size: 977
Editor: PieterSmit
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2015-06-27 15:55:16
Size: 1287
Editor: PieterSmit
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 19: Line 19:
 * Two main chains of thought for sub-netting
   1. Regional, e.g. Country, Site, Building, allowing for summerisation
   1. Functional, e.g Function, Site etc. allowing for security rules based on a prefix mask.
||/40 L1 || /48 L2 ||/56 L3 ||/64 ||
||Pop-WWW || Customer || Sites ||unspec ||

IPv6

  • While IPv4 has a fixed limit of around 4 billion IP addresses, IPv6 will have exponentially more, on the magnitude of around 340 billion billion billion billion (3.4×1038).
  • Next gen ip protocol
    •       As the 4 billion IPv4 addresses run out sometime early next decade (current estimates: 2011-2012), the Internet will stop growing if we do not find ways to tackle the  exhaust. The successor to IPv4 - IPv6 - allows 340 undecillion addresses or more than 50 billion billion billion per person on earth. 
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKMvGIHXgBg&feature=related

Address plan examples (2015)

  • Only first half /64 used, last half of ipv6 is for host-ID
  • Big company's may be issued with /32 IPv6 space.
  • Best practice is to use /48 for a site, with /64 for individual subnet's.
  • Two main chains of thought for sub-netting
    1. Regional, e.g. Country, Site, Building, allowing for summerisation
    2. Functional, e.g Function, Site etc. allowing for security rules based on a prefix mask.

/40 L1

/48 L2

/56 L3

/64

Pop-WWW

Customer

Sites

unspec

...


CategoryNetwork

ipv6 (last edited 2016-12-30 07:56:39 by PieterSmit)