Differences between revisions 6 and 7
Revision 6 as of 2011-05-24 10:18:34
Size: 1376
Editor: PieterSmit
Comment:
Revision 7 as of 2012-07-26 14:16:46
Size: 1375
Editor: PieterSmit
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 28: Line 28:
   * Problem was caused by ospf superbackbone rules tha.t kicked in due to putting the ospf instance in a vrf    * Problem was caused by ospf superbackbone rules that kicked in due to putting the ospf instance in a vrf

VRF

  • Visualizing a router. This is not about MPLS, although that is where the VRF concept comes from.
  • http://www.shafagh.net/2009/10/vrf-lite.html

  • Once a router has VRF software the interface must be upgraded to support VRF.
    •       (config)#vrf upgrade-cli
  • Sample Switch config with bgp and vrf.

Switch(config)# router bgp 800
Switch(config-router)# address-family ipv4 vrf vl2
Switch(config-router-af)# redistribute ospf 2 match internal
Switch(config-router-af)# neighbor 83.0.0.3 remote-as 100
Switch(config-router-af)# neighbor 83.0.0.3 activate
Switch(config-router-af)# network 8.8.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0
Switch(config-router-af)# exit

OSPF problems

  • Experienced problems where a router, connected to service provider MPLS using ospf area x, running vrf-lite, and connecting to area 0 on internal network would not show the area 0 routes.
    • Problem was caused by ospf superbackbone rules that kicked in due to putting the ospf instance in a vrf
    • Solution under ospf instance use command #capability vrf-lite
  • Ospf in MPLS VPN environment.

...


CategoryCisco

cisco/VRF (last edited 2015-07-01 11:49:30 by PieterSmit)